In starting this image analysis, it’s been hard to know where to start and with the guideline of “roughly 500 words”, I suppose I better get going and not go into how this image and it’s historical and iconographical significance could easily turn into a graduate dissertation. But—before I get ahead of myself or let my love of iconography get away from me, with an overview of context in mind, let’s begin.
The image I was granted to analyze (and which any forthcoming images, courtesy of
the Newberry Library, originate in if not otherwise specified) is La Grande Chronique Ancienne et Moderne, de Hollande, Zelande, West-Frise, Utrecht, Frise, Overyssel & Groeningen, Jusques à La Fin de L’ an 1600 [The Grand Chronicle Ancient and Modern of … , just at the end of the year 1600], authored by Jean François Le Petit and printed by Dodrecht in two volumes in 1601. Although I didn’t realize it until after perusing the first volume, this image appears in the second of the two books on page 522.
Before jumping into the image, a bit about the context. The book is written in French, although some of the ‘interlude’ texts (odes, poems, a preface)at the opening of each volume appear in Latin. (And before anything further, although I’ve studied French and basic Latin in my undergraduate career, it is necessary to say that while I can grasp ideas, I relied on online dictionaries for the majority of translations and the result is at best, a broken translation. I digress—) Both volumes begin with the same illustrated plate, the only difference in that of text and designation of “Tome Second” in Vol. II.
This rich plate and it’s references to muses and gods in the Roman tradition as well
as illustrations of a port city, instruments of the arts, war, navigation, and education, and presence of a globe are tantalizing to analyze, but for sake of time and sanity, this overview will continue. The volumes provide a chronicle—and portraitures—of great leaders of the European world. At first glance, the first volume and title would suggest that the focus would be on the titular places around the Dutch world and after perusing the first volume, that all portraitures of influential persons would be of men. To my surprise and pleasure, the image I was assigned is a portraiture of none other then Elizabeth I.
While some may dismiss that Elizabeth’s presence in a chronicle of influential men
would not be unique as she is so often cast as an ‘exceptional feminine’ to succeed in the sphere of men, in this text, she is not the exception as a portraiture of Margaret of Austria precedes her. Another aspect unique in considering this image: the next portrait is of Robert Dudley, whose influence pales in comparison to the rest of those depicted and whose close relationship with Elizabeth—both historically and in this text—is interesting.
A date on the page facing this portraiture places the text as occurring in the year 1585 at the start of the Anglo-Spanish War. Text below the image of Elizabeth
references the conflict and in a rough and brief summary, emphasizes Elizabeth’s protection of England and that the Spanish are not to be feared. Other—French—text that frames the image states “Elizabeth, Queen of England and Ireland, Defendresse [sic] of the Catholics, Protectrice [sic] of the liberty of the Provinces of the Netherlands” (roughly) as well as reference to her as “virginae reginae”—virgin queen. Although—with the close relation between this portraiture and that of Robert Dudley, one begins to wonder if a commentary on that phrase was called into questions by the author, printer, and contemporaneous readers as well as a host of modern historians.
In her portrait, Elizabeth stands in an unspecified space, whereas some other portraits include some reference to a real space with a floor, etc. The Elizabeth shown here is not a young Elizabeth, but one of realistic age—she would have been sixty-six at the time of this book’s production and would die three years later.
Although an image of an older Elizabeth, her images are no less striking than in her younger depictions and her visage is set strong, eyes looking off to the left and given the context of the passage, possibly poised to take in the Spanish armada with a look of resilience and bravery. Her crown is somewhere between an imperial and royal crowns still held in the British crown jewels and inexplicably resembles the coronation orb or ‘globus cruciger’ that she holds, an image that is also mirrored in the pattern and ornamentation of her globe-like skirts. Her dress is ornamental, including the Elizabethan collar of lace that is present in so many of this eras portraits of members of court. Her dress displays brocade and embroidery, jewels, and ribbon ties. At first glance, the sleeves of her dress resemble armor but on closer examination are intricate series of ties and bows—and whose shape has been under discussion as significant by some art historians, especially in contrast to the phallic nature of her scepter and the gender politics of Elizabethan’s rule as not only a woman, but a virgin. (Possibly more on those allusions another time!)
While this image on it’s own is a fascinating one, in the context of this work and the greater iconographical themes that surround depictions of Elizabeth, it joins the greater conversation of a royal and imperial ideology and rule of a feminine ruler in the early modern world.
[images courtesy of the Newberry Library Special Collections]



ct while considering the variation of what signs were not bilingual or in Spanish didn’t occur to me until one of my group pointed it out: all of the city or ‘federal’ signs were in English; none of these were bilingual.














(click photo for larger image) 
